AI Security Testing: Machine Learning Model Assessment and Protection

AI Security Testing: Machine Learning Model Assessment and Protection
Photo by Solen Feyissa / Unsplash

As artificial intelligence becomes integral to industries from healthcare to finance, securing machine learning (ML) models against evolving threats is critical. This article explores methodologies for assessing vulnerabilities, protecting models, and implementing robust security practices.

LLM Red Teaming: A Comprehensive Guide
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly advancing, but safety and security remain paramount concerns. Red teaming, a simulated adversarial assessment, is a powerful tool to identify LLM weaknesses and security threats. This article will explore the critical aspects of LLM red teaming, drawing on information from multiple sources, including the

AI Security Fundamentals

AI security focuses on safeguarding data, models, and infrastructure from threats like adversarial attacks, data breaches, and unauthorized access. Key risks include:

  • Data Exposure: Sensitive training data leakage through model inversion or extraction[1][3].
  • Adversarial Manipulation: Inputs crafted to deceive models into incorrect predictions[2][6].
  • Model Theft: Reverse-engineering proprietary models to replicate functionality[1][15].

Mitigation starts with encryption, access controls, and compliance with standards like GDPR and HIPAA[1][7].

Running Your Own Personal AI or LLMs on Home Infrastructure: A Comprehensive Guide
With the increasing capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and the desire for privacy and control, many enthusiasts and professionals are looking to run these models on their home infrastructure. This guide will walk you through the different types of LLMs, resource requirements, and detailed infrastructure configuration guidance to set

Model Vulnerability Assessment

Vulnerability assessments identify weaknesses in ML pipelines through:

Assessment Type Focus Tools/Methods
Static Analysis Code, dependencies, and configurations SAST tools, dependency scanners[4][10]
Dynamic Testing Runtime behavior and API interactions DAST tools, API fuzzing[6][8]
Adversarial Simulation Resilience against malicious inputs Red teaming, adversarial libraries[2][6]

Platforms like AppSOC and Robust Intelligence automate scanning for vulnerabilities such as toxic outputs, prompt injections, and insecure dependencies[2][6].


Data Poisoning Detection

Data poisoning involves injecting malicious samples into training data to corrupt model behavior. Detection strategies include:

  • Anomaly Detection: Identifying statistical outliers in training datasets[11].
  • Data Sanitization: Removing suspicious samples pre-training[15].
  • Model Monitoring: Tracking performance drifts indicative of tampering[6].

For example, a healthcare AI misdiagnosing patients due to poisoned data underscores the need for rigorous validation[11].


Model Protection Techniques

Protecting ML models involves multiple layers:

  1. Encryption: Securing data in transit and at rest using AES-256 or homomorphic encryption[3][15].
  2. Differential Privacy: Adding noise to training data to prevent leakage of individual records[1][6].
  3. Model Obfuscation: Techniques like watermarking or code minification to deter reverse-engineering[15].
  4. Access Controls: Role-based permissions for model access and API endpoints[3][7].

Adversarial Testing

Adversarial testing simulates real-world attacks to evaluate model robustness:

  • Red Teaming: Automated tools like IBM Adversarial Robustness Toolbox generate adversarial examples (e.g., perturbed images)[5][6].
  • Defense Mechanisms:
    • Adversarial Training: Exposing models to adversarial samples during training[1][6].
    • Input Validation: Sanitizing inputs via regex filters or ML-based anomaly detection[7][8].

Security Monitoring for AI

Continuous monitoring frameworks detect anomalies and enforce policies:

  • Real-Time Alerts: Flagging suspicious activities like abnormal API traffic[7].
  • Model Cards: Documenting performance metrics, vulnerabilities, and compliance status[6].
  • Integration with SIEM: Correlating AI risks with broader IT security events[7].

Tools like Wiz’s AI Security Posture Management provide dashboards for centralized oversight[7].


Compliance and Ethics

Regulatory adherence and ethical AI practices include:

  • Standards Alignment: NIST AI RMF, OWASP LLM Top 10, and MITRE ATLAS frameworks[7][9].
  • Bias Mitigation: Auditing models for discriminatory patterns using fairness metrics[6][9].
  • Transparency: Disclosing model limitations and data sources to stakeholders[9][15].

Future Security Challenges

Emerging threats demand proactive measures:

  • Quantum Attacks: Breaking encryption protocols securing AI models[15].
  • AI-Generated Deepfakes: Detecting synthetic media used in social engineering[6].
  • Supply Chain Risks: Vulnerabilities in third-party AI libraries and APIs[2][7].

Collaborative efforts like the Coalition for Secure AI aim to standardize defenses[7].


Securing machine learning models requires a multi-layered approach combining vulnerability assessments, adversarial testing, and continuous monitoring. By adopting frameworks like NIST AI RMF and tools such as AI Validation platforms, organizations can mitigate risks while fostering innovation. As AI evolves, staying ahead of threats will hinge on collaboration, transparency, and adaptive security practices.

NIST Trustworthy and Responsible AI NIST AI 100-2e2023
Key Takeaway The web page discusses Adversarial Machine Learning (AML) and presents a taxonomy and terminology of attacks and mitigations in the field of AML. It emphasizes the importance of securing AI systems against adversarial manipulations. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/NIST.AI.100-2e2023.pdf NIST.AI.100-2e2023NIST.AI.

Adversarial testing represents a paradigm shift in cybersecurity evaluation by simulating real-world attack scenarios, contrasting sharply with traditional security testing's focus on vulnerability identification. Here's how they differ across key dimensions:

Core Objectives

  • Adversarial Testing: Validates defenses against realistic attack chains (TTPs) to identify gaps in detection, response, and resilience158.
  • Traditional Testing: Focuses on cataloging known vulnerabilities through automated scans or compliance checklists68.

Methodology Comparison

AspectAdversarial TestingTraditional Testing
Emulates attacker behaviors (MITRE ATT&CK)Scans for CVEs/misconfigurations
Red teaming, breach simulation (BAS), exploit kitsSAST/DAST scanners, compliance tools
End-to-end attack lifecycle (initial access to data exfiltration)Isolated vulnerability detection
Hybrid (manual + automated attack simulations)Primarily automated
Advanced OSINT Techniques: From Basic Tools to Professional Intelligence Gathering
Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) has evolved into a cornerstone of modern intelligence operations, driven by technological advancements and the exponential growth of publicly available data. As we navigate 2025, OSINT practitioners must master a blend of traditional methodologies and cutting-edge tools to address complex challenges in cybersecurity, corporate intelligence, and

Key Differentiators

1. Attack RealismAdversarial testing replicates advanced persistent threats (APTs) using techniques like:

  • Credential phishing campaigns mirroring current attacker templates5
  • Exploiting chained vulnerabilities (e.g., combining unpatched services with weak IAM policies)4
  • Testing security tool efficacy during active breaches (e.g., bypassing EDR solutions)7

Traditional methods often miss these interconnected risks due to siloed vulnerability checks68.2. Defense ValidationAdversarial approaches test both preventive controls and operational capabilities:

  • Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) during simulated ransomware deployment
  • Security team response effectiveness to forged OAuth token attacks
  • Logging completeness for forensic analysis47

Traditional assessments rarely evaluate these operational metrics8.3. Risk PrioritizationAdversarial testing contextualizes vulnerabilities by demonstrating:

  • Which SQLi flaws are actually exploitable given network segmentation
  • Whether exposed API keys enable lateral movement
  • Business impact of compromised CI/CD pipelines57

Traditional reports often lack this exploitability context, leading to misprioritized remediation6.

Threat Intelligence Platform Development: From Data Collection to Analysis
Threat intelligence platforms (TIPs) have become indispensable tools for modern cybersecurity operations, enabling organizations to aggregate, analyze, and operationalize vast amounts of threat data. This technical guide explores the end-to-end development of a TIP, emphasizing open-source solutions, automation, and integration strategies that align with enterprise security needs. Advanced OSINT Techniques:

Implementation Models

Adversarial Frameworks

  • Breach & Attack Simulation (BAS): Automated platforms like Picus Security that continuously test defenses against updated TTPs8
  • Adversarial Controls Testing (ACT): Offensive exercises validating email/endpoint security against credential harvesting & malware5
  • Purple Teaming: Collaborative exercises where red teams attack while blue teams refine detection rules in real time14

Traditional Models

  • Vulnerability scanning (Nessus, Qualys)
  • Static code analysis (Checkmarx, SonarQube)
  • Compliance audits (PCI DSS, HIPAA checklists)

Outcome Comparison

MetricAdversarial TestingTraditional Testing
94% of emulated ransomware campaigns868% of CVEs in NVD database6
<5% (validated exploits)25-40% (uncontextualized alerts)
Measures response efficacyNo operational insights

When to Use Each Approach

  • Adversarial Testing:
    • Validating SOC/SIEM effectiveness
    • Testing novel attack vectors (AI model poisoning, cloud service abuse)
    • Post-incident readiness assessments47
  • Traditional Testing:
    • Regulatory compliance audits
    • Early SDLC vulnerability detection
    • Asset inventory management68

Leading organizations combine both: 78% of enterprises now use adversarial testing to supplement traditional scans, reducing breach impact by 41%8. By stress-testing defenses against evolving TTPs, adversarial methods provide the missing link between vulnerability existence and actual business risk.

Citations:
[1] https://www.tonex.com/training-courses/certified-ai-security-fundamentals-caisf/
[2] https://www.appsoc.com/blog/ai-security-testing---ensuring-model-and-system-integrity
[3] https://gca.isa.org/blog/how-to-secure-machine-learning-data
[4] https://www.indusface.com/blog/explore-vulnerability-assessment-types-and-methodology/
[5] https://www.linkedin.com/advice/1/what-best-way-test-machine-learning-model-security-8q0vf
[6] https://www.robustintelligence.com/platform/ai-validation
[7] https://www.wiz.io/academy/ai-security
[8] https://www.cobalt.io/blog/introduction-to-ai-penetration-testing
[9] https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/files/Principles-for-the-security-of-machine-learning.pdf
[10] https://www.getastra.com/blog/security-audit/vulnerability-assessment-methodology/
[11] https://www.blackduck.com/blog/how-to-safeguard-your-ai-ecosystem.html
[12] https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/pilot-artificial-intelligence-enabled-vulnerability-detection
[13] https://niccs.cisa.gov/education-training/catalog/tonex-inc/certified-ai-security-fundamentals-caisf
[14] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/training/modules/introduction-ai-security-testing/
[15] https://cpl.thalesgroup.com/blog/software-monetization/how-to-protect-your-machine-learning-models
[16] https://www.ninjaone.com/blog/machine-learning-in-cybersecurity/
[17] https://www.udemy.com/course/ai-security-essentials/
[18] https://checkmarx.com/learn/appsec/the-complete-guide-to-ai-application-security-testing/
[19] https://www.proofpoint.com/us/threat-reference/machine-learning
[20] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/training/paths/ai-security-fundamentals/
[21] https://owasp.org/www-project-ai-security-and-privacy-guide/
[22] https://www.tanium.com/blog/machine-learning-in-cybersecurity/
[23] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/training/modules/fundamentals-ai-security/
[24] https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/ai-security
[25] https://mixmode.ai/what-is/machine-learning-101-for-cybersecurity/
[26] https://www.academy.attackiq.com/courses/foundations-of-ai-security
[27] https://owaspai.org/docs/ai_security_overview/
[28] https://www.imperva.com/learn/application-security/vulnerability-assessment/
[29] https://www.esecurityplanet.com/networks/vulnerability-assessment-process/
[30] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/security/ai-red-team/ai-risk-assessment
[31] https://www.wiz.io/academy/ai-security-tools
[32] https://www.fhi360.org/wp-content/uploads/drupal/documents/Vulnerability Assessment Methods.pdf
[33] https://bishopfox.com/services/ai-ml-security-assessment
[34] https://www.optiv.com/insights/discover/downloads/ai-model-vulnerability-scan
[35] https://www.fortinet.com/resources/cyberglossary/vulnerability-assessment
[36] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ml-model-security-frameworks-industry-best-practices-dr-rabi-prasad-xjnrc
[37] https://securityintelligence.com/posts/ai-powered-vulnerability-management/
[38] https://brightsec.com/blog/vulnerability-testing-methods-tools-and-10-best-practices/
[39] https://www.cossacklabs.com/blog/machine-learning-security-ml-model-protection-on-mobile-apps-and-edge-devices/
[40] https://www.ninjaone.com/blog/data-poisoning/
[41] https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/cybersecurity-101/cyberattacks/data-poisoning/
[42] https://www.fortect.com/malware-damage/data-poisoning-definition-and-prevention/
[43] https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/10/23/1082189/data-poisoning-artists-fight-generative-ai/
[44] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-70375-w
[45] https://arxiv.org/html/2204.05986v3
[46] https://outshift.cisco.com/blog/ai-data-poisoning-detect-mitigate
[47] https://www.lakera.ai/blog/training-data-poisoning
[48] https://www.lasso.security/blog/data-poisoning
[49] https://venturebeat.com/ai/how-to-detect-poisoned-data-in-machine-learning-datasets/
[50] https://github.com/JonasGeiping/data-poisoning
[51] https://www.wiz.io/academy/ai-security
[52] https://learn.snyk.io/lesson/model-theft-llm/
[53] https://www.wwt.com/article/introduction-to-ai-model-security
[54] https://www.mathworks.com/help/rtw/ug/create-a-protected-model-using-the-model-block-context-menu.html
[55] https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/machine-learning-principles
[56] https://www.xenonstack.com/blog/generative-ai-models-security
[57] https://www.scworld.com/perspective/five-ways-to-protect-ai-models
[58] https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/security/machine-learning-security.html
[59] https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/ai-security-steps/
[60] https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity21/presentation/sun-zhichuang
[61] https://owasp.org/www-project-machine-learning-security-top-10/
[62] https://cltc.berkeley.edu/aml/
[63] https://www.holisticai.com/glossary/adversarial-testing
[64] https://www.datacamp.com/blog/adversarial-machine-learning
[65] https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/guides/adv-testing
[66] https://developer.ibm.com/tutorials/awb-adversarial-prompting-security-llms
[67] https://www.nccoe.nist.gov/ai/adversarial-machine-learning
[68] https://hiddenlayer.com/innovation-hub/the-tactics-and-techniques-of-adversarial-ml/
[69] https://www.rstreet.org/commentary/safeguarding-ai-a-policymakers-primer-on-adversarial-machine-learning-threats/
[70] https://www.secureworks.com/blog/dangerous-assumptions-why-adversarial-testing-matters
[71] https://neptune.ai/blog/adversarial-machine-learning-defense-strategies
[72] http://adversarial-ml-tutorial.org/adversarial_training/
[73] https://smartsentryai.com
[74] https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/ai-in-threat-detection
[75] https://www.easyvista.com/blog/why-ai-is-important-in-monitoring/
[76] https://www.hakimo.ai
[77] https://www.cnet.com/home/security/features/i-thought-id-hate-ai-in-home-security-i-couldnt-have-been-more-wrong/
[78] https://protectai.com
[79] https://www.truehomeprotection.com/leveraging-ai-and-machine-learning-for-advanced-intrusion-detection-in-commercial-security-systems/
[80] https://www.sentinelone.com/cybersecurity-101/data-and-ai/ai-threat-detection/
[81] https://www.pentegrasystems.com/ai-powered-security-monitoring-software/
[82] https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework
[83] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/aws-caf-for-ai/security-perspective-compliance-and-assurance-of-aiml-systems.html
[84] https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/blog/2024/08/05/the-future-of-cybersecurity-compliance-how-ai-is-leading-the-way
[85] https://www.captechu.edu/blog/ethical-considerations-of-artificial-intelligence
[86] https://securityintelligence.com/articles/navigating-ethics-ai-cybersecurity/
[87] https://www.exin.com/article/ai-compliance-what-it-is-and-why-you-should-care/
[88] https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/ethical-considerations-of-ai
[89] https://www.americanbar.org/groups/intellectual_property_law/resources/landslide/2024-summer/incorporating-ai-road-map-legal-ethical-compliance/
[90] https://www.compunnel.com/blogs/the-intersection-of-ai-and-data-security-compliance-in-2024/
[91] https://www.americancentury.com/insights/ai-risks-ethics-legal-concerns-cybersecurity-and-environment/
[92] https://www.domo.com/glossary/why-ai-is-important-for-security-and-compliance
[93] https://ovic.vic.gov.au/privacy/resources-for-organisations/artificial-intelligence-and-privacy-issues-and-challenges/
[94] https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/01/global-cybersecurity-outlook-complex-cyberspace-2025/
[95] https://www.esecurityplanet.com/trends/ai-and-cybersecurity-innovations-and-challenges/
[96] https://oit.utk.edu/security/learning-library/article-archive/ai-machine-learning-risks-in-cybersecurity/
[97] https://www.csoonline.com/article/3800962/2025-cybersecurity-and-ai-predictions.html
[98] https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/blog/sase/the-future-of-ai-security-three-trends-every-executive-should-watch/
[99] https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/10/cyber-resilience-emerging-technology-ai-cybersecurity/
[100] https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2025/01/06/2025-predictions-the-impact-of-ai-on-cybersecurity/
[101] https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/01/cybersecurity-ai-frontline-artificial-intelligence/
[102] https://www.nttdata.com/global/en/insights/focus/2024/security-risks-of-generative-ai-and-countermeasures
[103] https://www.darkreading.com/vulnerabilities-threats/new-ai-challenges-test-ciso-teams-2025
[104] https://www.forbes.com/sites/garydrenik/2024/08/08/addressing-security-challenges-in-the-expanding-world-of-ai/
[105] https://keepnetlabs.com/blog/generative-ai-security-risks-8-critical-threats-you-should-know
[106] https://www.synack.com/solutions/security-testing-for-ai-and-llms/
[107] https://www.nightfall.ai/ai-security-101/data-poisoning
[108] https://blogs.infosys.com/digital-experience/emerging-technologies/preventing-data-poisoning-in-ai.html
[109] https://hiddenlayer.com/innovation-hub/understanding-ai-data-poisoning/
[110] https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/data-poisoning
[111] https://securing.ai/ai-security/data-poisoning-ml/
[112] https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/definition/data-poisoning-AI-poisoning
[113] https://www.sentinelone.com/cybersecurity-101/cybersecurity/data-poisoning/
[114] https://www.wiz.io/academy/data-poisoning
[115] https://www.leewayhertz.com/ai-model-security/
[116] https://cpl.thalesgroup.com/blog/software-monetization/how-to-protect-your-machine-learning-models
[117] https://outshift.cisco.com/blog/ai-system-security-strategies
[118] https://www.excella.com/insights/ml-model-security-preventing-the-6-most-common-attacks
[119] https://www.sentinelone.com/cybersecurity-101/data-and-ai/ai-data-security/
[120] https://www.mend.io/blog/how-do-i-protect-my-ai-model/
[121] https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/files/Principles-for-the-security-of-machine-learning.pdf
[122] https://viso.ai/deep-learning/adversarial-machine-learning/
[123] https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-are-adversarial-attacks-on-AI-Machine-Learning
[124] https://www.ministryoftesting.com/articles/metamorphic-and-adversarial-strategies-for-testing-ai-systems
[125] https://www.leapwork.com/blog/adversarial-testing
[126] https://www.coursera.org/articles/adversarial-machine-learning
[127] https://hiddenlayer.com/innovation-hub/whats-in-the-box/
[128] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adversarial_machine_learning
[129] https://roundtable.datascience.salon/decoding-adversarial-attacks-types-and-techniques-in-the-age-of-generative-ai
[130] https://sysdig.com/learn-cloud-native/top-8-ai-security-best-practices/
[131] https://strapi.io/blog/best-ai-security-tools
[132] https://www.azoai.com/article/Advancing-Security-Monitoring-with-Artificial-Intelligence.aspx
[133] https://www.galileo.ai/blog/ai-security-best-practices
[134] https://www.jit.io/resources/appsec-tools/continuous-security-monitoring-csm-tools
[135] https://www.agsprotect.com/blog/ai-and-machine-learning-in-security-services
[136] https://perception-point.io/guides/ai-security/ai-security-risks-frameworks-and-best-practices/
[137] https://www.eweek.com/artificial-intelligence/best-ai-security-tools/
[138] https://intervision.com/blog-enhancing-ai-security-and-compliance/
[139] https://www.evolvesecurity.com/blog-posts/ethical-implementation-of-ai-in-cybersecurity
[140] https://www.tevora.com/resource/what-is-ai-compliance/
[141] https://intone.com/ethical-considerations-in-ai-powered-cybersecurity-solutions/
[142] https://www.ispartnersllc.com/blog/ai-compliance/
[143] https://community.trustcloud.ai/docs/grc-launchpad/grc-101/governance/data-privacy-and-ai-ethical-considerations-and-best-practices/
[144] https://www.wiz.io/academy/ai-compliance
[145] https://darktrace.com/blog/why-artificial-intelligence-is-the-future-of-cybersecurity
[146] https://www.malwarebytes.com/cybersecurity/basics/risks-of-ai-in-cyber-security
[147] https://www.welivesecurity.com/en/cybersecurity/cybersecurity-ai-what-2025-have-store/
[148] https://thehackernews.com/2025/02/ai-and-security-new-puzzle-to-figure-out.html
[149] https://www.msspalert.com/news/ai-based-attacks-top-gartners-list-of-emerging-threats-again
[150] https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/secure-ai-in-2025-lessons-we-have-learned-a-27468
[151] https://www.sentinelone.com/cybersecurity-101/data-and-ai/ai-security-risks/
[152] https://perception-point.io/guides/ai-security/top-6-ai-security-risks-and-how-to-defend-your-organization/

Read more